Video: Board Procedures Questions and Debates

March 7th, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

This video is the last hour and twenty minutes of the March 6, 2012 Calgary Board of Education board meeting where the trustees questioned and debated the new board procedures. The video of the rest of the meeting will be up in a couple of days.

CBE Board meeting March 7, 2012 excerpt – board procedures debate from ARTICS AssocResponsiveTrusteeCgy on Vimeo.

0:00 Corrections to the board procedures

3:43 Introduction of report by Trustee Bowen-Eyre

5:05 Trustee Ferguson moves to temporarily suspend Robert’s Rules of Order to eliminate debate on each amendment and just have a single session of debate (two rounds, with each trustee being able to speak for three minutes in each round) for the main motion and all amendments although they will each be voted on separately. Motion passes with Trustees Bowen-Eyre, Ferguson, King, Cochrane and Lane in favour. Trustees Taylor and Bazinet opposed.

14:30 Chair Cochrane states that Trustees Bowen-Eyre and King will be answering most of the questions as she is not temporarily stepping down as chair. As she was part of the working group bringing forward the motion, it is required by Robert’s Rules of Order that she step down for this item, as she did on December 20 when the procedures first came forward.

14:50 Trustee Bazinet asks how board meeting business can be introduced by anyone other than administration. How can a trustee bring forward a motion?

20:30 Trustee Taylor asks how a trustee can bring forward a motion to ask administration for a report about any matter.

27:52 Trustee Bazinet asks Chair Cochrane to step out of the chair as she is answering many questions. Chair Cochrane puts it to an informal vote of the Board (ie. No formal motion is made to suspend Robert’s Rules for this) and Trustees Bowen-Eyre, Ferguson, King, and Lane indicate she should remain as chair.

28:40 Trustee Taylor asking for clarity on the use of “deliberations” in informal work sessions since nothing that furthers the work of the board can be legally done in these sessions.

31:10 Trustee King talks about how confidential information has been leaked to the Calgary Herald

31:30 Trustee Taylor asks how a trustee is to determine what is confidential in an informal work session since there are no motions to move in-camera and trustee opinions vary on what is confidential.

34:50 Trustee Taylor asks why, if this document is about legally constituted meetings, there are references throughout the document to meetings that are not legally constituted (ie. Informal work sessions).

37:58 Trustee Taylor asks the legal counsel how a trustee can know what is public or private information that comes forward in an informal work session.

40:06 Legal counsel asks for more information on what is done in these informal work sessions so that he can give more specific advice, and Chair Cochrane deflects the request by saying that time is short and they need to move on.

40:48 Trustee Taylor asks when debriefing will occur as the description says it happens after the conclusion of the meeting and the agenda template says it will happen before adjournment.

48:43 Trustee Bowen-Eyre brings forward the motion. Trustee Taylor presents her four amendments (that were previously sent to the Board).
#1. To remove all references to informal meetings in the document.
#2. To keep the provision for trustees to be able to make trustee inquiries which was removed in the new procedures.
#3. To keep the provision for trustees to be able to make a notice of motion which was removed in the new procedures.
#4. That board meeting agendas and reports be available publicly four days before the meeting (and two days after the trustees receive them) rather than one day as in the procedures.

57:14 Trustee Bowen-Eyre opens debate

59:50 Trustee Bazinet 1st round of debate

1:01:40 Trustee Taylor 1st round of debate

1:04:58 Trustee King 1st round of debate. Trustee Taylor makes a point of order that she feels that Trustee King is being disrespectful of other trustees. Chair Cochrane rules that there is no disrespect according to their procedures. Trustee King continues and makes allegations of bullying.

1:11:27 Trustee Taylor 2nd round of debate

1:14:08 Trustee Bazinet 2nd round of debate

1:16:40 Trustee Bowen-Eyre closes debate stating that she did an assessment of all 62 Albert school boards and that according to her assessment, the CBE is the most transparent and accountable of them all.

1:18:40 Voting on amendment #1. Motion fails with Trustees Taylor and Bazinet in favour and Trustees Bowen-Eyre, Ferguson, King, Cochrane and Lane opposed.

Voting on amendment #2. Motion fails with Trustee Taylor in favour and Trustees Bowen-Eyre, Ferguson, King, Cochrane, Lane and Bazinet opposed.

Voting on amendment #3. Motion fails with Trustees Taylor and Bazinet in favour and Trustees Bowen-Eyre, Ferguson, King, Cochrane and Lane opposed.

Voting on amendment #4. Motion fails with Trustees Taylor and Bazinet in favour and Trustees Bowen-Eyre, Ferguson, King, Cochrane and Lane opposed.

Voting on motion to approve the new procedures passes with Trustees Bowen-Eyre, Ferguson, King, Cochrane and Lane in favour and Trustees Taylor and Bazinet opposed.

1:20:48 Approval of consent agenda and late submission of Jan. 17 meeting minutes.

CBE Board Procedures Revisited

March 6th, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

Five days before Christmas last year, a working group comprised of Trustees Cochrane, King and Bowen-Eyre brought forward a proposal to make significant changes to the Calgary Board of Education board procedures. After a public outcry and a couple of hours of discussion, the trustees voted to send it back to the working group Read More...

CBE Board Meeting February 21, 2012

February 22nd, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

0:00 Welcome, O Canada 19:20 Chief Superintendent Johnson gives a brief response to the provincial budget 24:05 Stakeholder reports: Helen Mowat, (27:50) four parents speaking about the proposed Arabic bilingual program 46:20 Trustee Taylor's inquiry: "In the context of the legal review described in the Calgary Herald article of September 20, 2011, was a formal request for proposal (RFP) completed prior to retaining the ongoing legal services of Davis LLP or were the services of Davis LLP contracted via "single source" purchasing?" Answer: "The services of Davis LLP were engaged through a sole-source agreement Read More...

CBE sends warning to ARTICS

February 16th, 2012

By Larry Leach

On January 26, 2012, ARTICS received a letter from James Bancroft, a lawyer with Davis LLP. The letter and ARTICS' response can be found below. ARTICS is concerned that this is an attempt by the Calgary Board of Education to intimidate and silence ARTICS. We are a small group of concerned citizens, who are not affiliated with, and do not receive funding from, any other organization Read More...

December public vs. private meeting time

February 9th, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

The final December 2011 meeting minutes were approved at the February 7, 2012 public board meeting, which explains the lateness of this review. In December, the CBE trustees again met far more in private than in public. In total, they met for 23 hours and 16 minutes. Public time for December: 8 hours, 15 minutes (or 35 Read More...

CBE Board Meeting February 7, 2012

February 8th, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

CBE Board Meeting February 7, 2012 from ARTICS AssocResponsiveTrusteeCgy on Vimeo. 0:00 Welcome, O Canada West View school presentation Trustee Bazinet questions additional funding received based on increased enrolment

Urgent: CBE Fee Review

February 6th, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

In spring 2011, the CBE Board of Trustees significantly increased transportation fees. Due to the resulting uproar, they promised a comprehensive fee review. We are pleased that the CBE has begun work on this fee review process. Good governance means communicating with the public, explaining why the current system functions the way it does, and discovering what is working and what needs to be improved Read More...

Confused about the new policies?

February 2nd, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

There has been a lot of conflicting information about the new Calgary Board of Education policies. Here are a few frequently asked questions in order to help clarify a few things. 1. Are these policies significantly different from the old policies? From what trustees have said in the board room and at a recent CAPSC meeting, the answer is no Read More...

CBE Board Meeting January 24, 2012

January 26th, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

This is the board meeting where the trustees unanimously approve their new board procedures. CBE Board Meeting January 24, 2012 from ARTICS AssocResponsiveTrusteeCgy on Vimeo. 0:36 Welcome & O Canada 3:10 Lord Beaverbrook school presentation 43:30 Public questions. Question from Jennifer Andrews: Can you please tell us what the cost of having the Aspen Group consult, as well as the cost of any other outside groups required, in formulating the plan to adopt the new governance policies planned to be passed in tonight's meeting Read More...

CBE Board Meeting January 17, 2012

January 18th, 2012

By Trina Hurdman

Untitled from ARTICS AssocResponsiveTrusteeCgy on Vimeo. 0:00 Welcome, O Canada, trustee and chief superintendent reports 12:35 Start of the policy revision discussion 25:05 Board development session: Internal Assessment System 1:04:50 Questions from trustees on the board development session 1:29:34 Discussion as to whether or not trustees should debate 1st reading of the policies 1:33:30 Debate to adopt the Coherent Governance model Read More...